Sunday, 26 April 2009

  • On love and delight

    When I think about the people I love, I am filled with a fondness and appreciation for them. I think about the experiences I've had with them, their personality quirks that are endearing and some that are less endearing, the ways we've been there for one another. Clearly, love in this light is very history dependent and doesn't apply to babies.

    When I became a mother, I was dropped into this new status with the arrival of a small squirming mini. The mini has no past beyond her gestational wiggles. She doesn't have a discernable personality other than hating change. And frankly, she doesn't have much to offer; she's a giant ball of need. Nevertheless, I was shocked that I didn't 'love' in the mini the moment I laid eyes on her. Isn't that the way things are supposed to go; the baby pops out and you're in love? The mini popped out and between being exhausted and the nurses taking her to get checked on, I didn't even look at her for the better part of her first hour. For the first couple weeks, I thought I was a really wacked out mom because I didn't feel warm fuzzies about the mini, particularly @ 2AM in her "purple howler" form. I thought I didn't "love" the mini and that was really weird/jacked/wrong.

    Reflecting on the first couple weeks of new-momness, I have the old DC talk song bouncing around that "Love is a verb." Love is attending to these needs that the mini has, which are in fact fairly basic: 1) I am hungry 2) I have soiled myself 3) I am uncomfortable gassy 4) I have a mystery need. And we have been lovingly attending to the mini since she was born. Whew. So maybe I did love the mini. It's the fondness and appreciation that has taken longer to develop.

    I'm happy to report that at about 2AM on Monday, the mini had finished feeding and was asleep and I realized that I did delight in her. (Or perhaps so I thought in my early morning delirium.) She was maybe 2 and a half weeks old, but that was apparently enough time to develop some history between us. The mini has a wonderfully expressive face, and we've been able to watch her morph her features from bliss to despair, from Stewie to Yoda. She doesn't have a whole lot of personality, but we're enjoying what we've got.

    I wonder if we actually love the people we delight in? In these early weeks of parenthood, I've realized that my expectations of love are really expectations of delight. While love and delight often go hand in hand, if love truly is a verb, am I serving all those people that I feel fondly about? Beyond my feelings, how do I actually care for them? 



Comments (3)

  • ennahart

    lol!  What a peculiar observation.  Though not unheard of...I remember a law school assistant dean referring to babies in this newborn period as "pet rocks" (and she's had three).  I hear it gets better when they start developing personalities a few more months later.  Anyway, thanks for sharing... definitely helps adjust expectations!

  • gus00gus

    oh i like this post.  

  • anonymous

    As one person you might feel fondly towards, you sure are wonderful at actively caring for me, Andrea. The only people who send me mail in TZ after all these years are you and an elderly, house-bound lady at my parents' church. When the saints go marching in, you and Barbara will be in that number!

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

Who recommended?

Who gave the eProps?

2 eProps from: